I'm glad they're trying to do this. It's the stupidest, most idiotic, moronic idea I've ever heard of and I applaud their effort. In fact, I hope they try to outdo themselves with something that even surpasses this proposal for its 'Duh' factor.
What am I talking about? I was listening to Michael Medved on the radio yesterday and he spoke about the geniuses in Seattle proposing a law that would make it illegal for a landlord to consider an individual's criminal background when determining someones viability as a reasonable tenant.
Of course, I don't want to saddle Seattle's landlords with such an insane law. But, as the liberal progressives pile insanity upon insanity, fewer and fewer Americans will be able to ignore the fact that something crazy is afoot. Too many American voters didn't notice the insanity of electing an ultra-liberal, with an unknown background president of the United States. For all we know about Obama - whether we dig in Hawaii or Kenya - there might just be an infant's grave containing the bones of a newborn jackal.
OK, now I'm sounding crazy - but just a little bit. The point is that Obama and the liberal progressives generally hid in the shadows of obscurity during the election of 2008. Sure, Obama's smiling, teleprompter reading face was splattered across television, internet and newspapers, but what did we really know about him, and how much interest did the Left-stream media really exhibit in its effort to vet the presidential candidate? Kind of like voting on a 2,700 bill before reading it, we elected Obama so that we could see what we got once we had him in the White House.
Well, now we've seen. Of course, the Left-stream media is still trying to run interference for the man but that will only go so far. Libya erupts into revolution and we see Obama's backswing while teeing off at the 9th Hole. An earthquake and Tsunami engulf Japan in a radioactive disaster, and Obama graces us with his NCAA picks.
It's not just in the White House. Here in Illinois, we have a liberal progressive attorney general, the daughter of the liberal-progressive, big-spending Speaker of the Illinois House of Representatives, agreeing with the Left-stream Associated Propaganda that gun card and gun ownership records should be open material. Never mind that the Constitutionally questionable records are required by the state - now that Illinois has forced people to sign up to exercise their 2nd Amendment rights, the state wants to turn over that list to the liberal biased medai.
Let's look at the media for a little liberal-progressive insanity. Members of the Left-stream media have hurled every possible vile epitaph at conservatives and TEA Party members these last two years, accused them of violence when there was nothing to report, rashly pointed the finger at the TEA Party when violence did occur only to find out the violence did not originate from the right. And what did the Left-stream media have to say about death threats to Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker? ................................................................. Yep, that's the sound of silence. Not a peep.
So let the liberal jerks in Seattle propose laws that require landlords to ignore a rapist's criminal background when he wants to move into the apartment next to several teenage girls. Never mind that the child molester wants to live next door to the young couple with several young boys. And, just because that guy with the crazy look in his eyes has killed before, that's no reason to stop him from moving into that quiet little apartment block.
Of course, none of these examples even begin to address the idea that criminals shouldn't find life easier as a result of their crimes; that making life a little more difficult for criminals might actually persuade some potential criminals, or prior criminals to choose a different path in life.
Showing posts with label 2nd Amendment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2nd Amendment. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
Thursday, March 3, 2011
AP - Associated Propaganda - sheds veil of journalistic ethics for liberal agenda
I challenge the liberal progressives at the AP (Associated Propaganda) to show me how a FOIA request for all the records of private gun owners in Illinois is not a grossly biased act. For what purpose have they made this request? How is this news? Will it serve the public beyond the scope of advancing the liberal progressive agenda?
No, it’s not ‘news’ to name all the people who own guns. Our laws and our Constitution support the right to own guns. This is nothing more than the AP’s version of a Wikileaks moment – exposing information for the pure and simple sake of exposing information.
OK, it’s not news, so why do it? Why ask the Illinois State Police to provide information about individual citizens that, for those who have chosen to exercise their right to bear arms, is required by the State of Illinois? If I grant the Associated Propaganda a great big, enormous benefit of the doubt, assuming it has nothing to do with furthering the liberal cause, I draw a complete blank.
So, help me out. Show me how this has a reasonable and appropriate purpose from a journalistic standpoint. Oh, and that means with the application of actual journalistic ethics and standards, not the Left-serving version the Left-stream media has openly operated under these last several years. I say the “last several years” because, prior to that, I think the Left-stream media made a thinly veiled attempt to hide its bias or at least to give the impression that they were policing their own work.
Now, the veil has been torn aside. And who has exposed the Left-stream media for what it is? The Left-stream media has. It wasn’t an incredible case of investigative reporting. The Left-stream media, with a ultra-liberal president and an ultra-liberal Congress assumed, a couple years ago, that they didn’t have to hide any longer. They didn’t have to worry about it.
You might say the Left-stream media misread the elections of 2008. There is a quietly long-held sense within the liberal camp that, with liberal indoctrination in our schools, matched by liberal propaganda in the press and subliminal liberal messages in entertainment, as the old fogies died away, those folks once called by a Left-winter – “The Greatest Generation” – the nation would eventually become a liberal socialist utopia.
The TEA Party upset that applecart, though it took the Left-stream media a while to catch on. They thought they could call conservatives TEA Baggers and make unsubstantiated claims of violent conservatives with impunity.
So, when the Left-stream media outlet – the Associated Propoganda – makes a wholly unreasonable request for the private records of gun owners in the state, they assumed they had the forces in power to push that request through quietly. They were almost right.
Lisa Madigan apparently thinks gun owners in this state don’t have a right to privacy. Of course, she also doesn’t think gun owners in this state have a right to own guns. She’s all too willing to help the Associated Propaganda line Illinoisans up like sheep to be sheared.
Madigan shares the same agenda with the Associated Propaganda and, instead of performing her duties based on principles, she has chosen to apply her ideology to her responsibilities, just as the idiots at the Associated Propaganda have done.
Governor Pat Quinn might go along with that, though he’s less likely to do so in the face of a political firestorm. Thankfully, the Illinois State Police were a little more level headed about the request.
Labels:
2nd Amendment,
associated press,
concealed weapon,
democrats,
governor Quinn,
illinois,
illinois state police,
liberal media,
liberal progressives,
Right to Bear Arms
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
Who's taking that swan dive into the political rocks below? Lisa Madigan, that's who.
I wonder if the term "political suicide" means anything to Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan? It should as she seems to be taking a high dive off of the Cliffs of Most Idiotic Decisions by Public Officials. Madigan, for those of you who haven't heard, has endorsed the FOIA request from a Associated Press reporter demanding that the Illinois State Police turnover the list of gun owners in the state and a list of the weapons those owners are allowed to own.
To their credit, the Illinois State Police have said, "No." Madigan appears to think she has the authority to force the issue though I understand the State Police actually answer to the governor.
The Freedom Of Information Act compels government bodies to provide copies of government records to citizens upon appropriate request and at a reasonable cost for duplication. Of course, the way things work in this country, Madigan would probably try to enforce an FOIA on the Illinois National Guard if it was submitted by Al Qaeda.
What some may not realize is that an FOIA request does not absolutely force the government to turn over documents. The government body has a certain amount of time to consider the request. The government body can also say, "No." If the government body does say, "No" the requester has a right to go before a judge to ask that the government body be forced to comply.
At that time, the judge will consider the argument of the government body for withholding the information. In the case of the AP's request for a list of those with permits to own guns, the FOIA request runs roughshod over individual rights to privacy. It also illuminates one of the greatest concerns raised by gun owners over the years who have argued that gun-ownership permits create lists that defy the goal of the 2nd Amendment in establishing a safeguard against a takeover of the government in opposition to the Constitution.
With the release of this information, should such a government takeover occur, the enemies of Constitutional government would know just where to go to collect all the 'legally owned' guns and their owners. Of course, that's merely a hypothetical situation at this point. But, as shown in the FOXNews story linked above, Illinois Representative Ron Stephens has pointed out that turning over such a list not only identifies who owns a gun but who doesn't.
Once published, criminals who don't want to worry about breaking into the home of someone who could shoot back would be able to quickly identify which homes are easy pickings.
I suppose, if Madigan has considered the political implications of this situation at all, she's banking on the support of all the anti-gun Liberals in the state to maintain her future electability. I think this is a pipe dream. Once those who don't own guns realize that 'everyone' knows they don't own guns, even the anti-gun crowd may find their continued support for her problematic. And, for the gun owners in the state, this is a galvanizing moment.
I wonder what Madigan was planning after public office. She might just want to dust off that resume. I think she's going to need it.
To their credit, the Illinois State Police have said, "No." Madigan appears to think she has the authority to force the issue though I understand the State Police actually answer to the governor.
The Freedom Of Information Act compels government bodies to provide copies of government records to citizens upon appropriate request and at a reasonable cost for duplication. Of course, the way things work in this country, Madigan would probably try to enforce an FOIA on the Illinois National Guard if it was submitted by Al Qaeda.
What some may not realize is that an FOIA request does not absolutely force the government to turn over documents. The government body has a certain amount of time to consider the request. The government body can also say, "No." If the government body does say, "No" the requester has a right to go before a judge to ask that the government body be forced to comply.
At that time, the judge will consider the argument of the government body for withholding the information. In the case of the AP's request for a list of those with permits to own guns, the FOIA request runs roughshod over individual rights to privacy. It also illuminates one of the greatest concerns raised by gun owners over the years who have argued that gun-ownership permits create lists that defy the goal of the 2nd Amendment in establishing a safeguard against a takeover of the government in opposition to the Constitution.
With the release of this information, should such a government takeover occur, the enemies of Constitutional government would know just where to go to collect all the 'legally owned' guns and their owners. Of course, that's merely a hypothetical situation at this point. But, as shown in the FOXNews story linked above, Illinois Representative Ron Stephens has pointed out that turning over such a list not only identifies who owns a gun but who doesn't.
Once published, criminals who don't want to worry about breaking into the home of someone who could shoot back would be able to quickly identify which homes are easy pickings.
I suppose, if Madigan has considered the political implications of this situation at all, she's banking on the support of all the anti-gun Liberals in the state to maintain her future electability. I think this is a pipe dream. Once those who don't own guns realize that 'everyone' knows they don't own guns, even the anti-gun crowd may find their continued support for her problematic. And, for the gun owners in the state, this is a galvanizing moment.
I wonder what Madigan was planning after public office. She might just want to dust off that resume. I think she's going to need it.
Labels:
2nd Amendment,
associated press,
foia,
governor Quinn,
illinois,
illinois state police,
liberal media,
rep. ron stephens,
Right to Bear Arms
Monday, February 28, 2011
Right to Bear Arms - clearly stated (a must see video)
I just received this in an e-mail from the Schaumburg TEA Party. It's definitely worth a few minutes of your time: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4069761537893819675#
Labels:
2nd Amendment,
america,
concealed weapon,
constitution,
Right to Bear Arms,
tea party,
Texas
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)